December 14, 2012

Stone Smoked Porter with Chipotle Peppers slash Vanilla Beans

Stone Smoked Porter with Chipotle Peppers (2012)
Limited Release (Brewed Once).
12 fl. oz. / $3.99 USD / 5.9% ABV

About: "Stone Smoked Porter w/ Chipotle Peppers is a thing of spicy glory, with the just-right heat of smoked jalapeños (aka chipotles) that combines beautifully with the beer's peat-smoked malt and roasty character. The idea came about in 2006 when Merchandise Manager Chris Carroll suggested we make a special "South of the Border Stone Smoked Porter" for Cinco de Mayo that year. One sip, and we were hooked! Malts: Pale, Crystal 75, Chocolate, Peat-Smoked / Hops: Columbus and Mt. Hood"

Thoughts: The cap popped off of this one with a high pitched hiss and the beer itself poured a dark reddish-brown with a light, almond colored head.

Aside from the base of the beer, the scent from this one is really different from the vanilla beans version. First off, it's a lot more subtle. Those chipotle peppers aren't really coming through too strong here. It's incorporated into the beer scent pretty well, but I thought it would be coming at me like that vanilla. Which came on strong and heavy. It's got a fiery flare about it overall, but while the vanilla was up front, the chipotle in this version is just an undertone. Mild chocolate and a few coffee beans back it up.

Well, the chipotle is all in the taste, that's for sure. Too bad it's not hot. There's a very nice blend of flavors here though. The peppers add a subtle spice to the whole brew and just add another really awesome dimension to it. It's not much, but definitely an improvement. Hell, anything with a little added heat is always better, that's the way I think. I just wish this one were a little hotter. Chipotles have a really unique taste, but it all seems a bit too far removed here. There's a little bit of grass on the end of this one. Weird, I didn't get that in the other one. Slightly disappointed? If I can find a bottle the day it's made next time then I'll grab it and drink it immediately. If there is a next time! Probably even drink it warm too.

Mouth is a bit watery and just a little frothy.

I enjoyed this, but not as much as the vanilla bean version and honestly I thought it would be the other way around as I love chipotle peppers. Vanilla is cool too I guess though, and wins out in this beer-off.

Stone Smoked Porter with Vanilla Beans (2012)
Limited Release (Brewed Once).
12 fl. oz. / $3.99 USD / 5.9% ABV

About: "Stone Smoked Porter w/ Vanilla Bean was the brainchild of Small Batch Brewer Laura Ulrich, who had a stroke of genius after trying Stone Smoked Porter poured over a couple scoops of vanilla ice cream. The complex flavor of Madagascar vanilla beans melds perfectly with the chocolaty  malty, coffee-like character of the beer, making it almost like a liquid dessert, but without an overbearing sweetness. Malts: Pale, Crystal 75, Chocolate, Peat-Smoked / Hops: Columbus and Mt. Hood"

Thoughts: Smoked Porter VB poured a dark reddish brown color with a huge light tan head on top. The bottle didn't make any noise when I popped the cap, but it poured out lookin' quality.

Holy shit this smells awesome! It's like straight up chocolate milk with a touch of vanilla, and a hint of the booze man. It's like, chocolate and vanilla soft serve with marshmallows on top. Or a chocolate milkshake. Damn, that's badass. Minor hint of coffee. Lay back coffee... lay back.

The taste is definitely smokey right off the bat. I'm thinking on first sip that this is one of the best, in not thee best Porter I've drank thus far, though I haven't had many. It's got a certain rawness to the taste. Those vanilla and coffee beans are just mingling in harmony here, then there's that blast of smokiness that comes rushing through the middle. Mild and slightly bitter chocolate notes ride this beer out and there's nothing at all unpleasant about it. Hops take a back seat but start to show about halfway through. Bottom line is that this one is just downright enjoyable.

Mouth feel is pretty watery, there's a lot of froth, and I do wish it could be a little thicker, but it's not a problem. Aside from that it feels like a pretty solid beer. Nicely done. Low bitterness, chocolaty, and that vanilla swirl just takes it to the next level.

December 12, 2012

Evil Twin, Stillwater and Stone The Perfect Crime

Evil Twin, Stillwater and Stone "The Perfect Crime" - Black Smoked Saison (2012)
Limited Collaboration Brew.
12 fl. oz. / $3.59 USD / 6.8% ABV

About: "Dark with deception, mysteriously smoked, unexplainably dry, and intriguingly hopped," as Strumke states on his bottle, this beer gets away with the farmhouse ale classification... but just barely. Like traditional farmhouse ales, Belgian saison yeast provides intense fruit and spice notes. However, unlike traditional saisons, the beer is black as night, has added viscosity, and pronounced smoke character that dominates thanks to the brewers’ decision to use oak-smoked wheat malt, a new malt style that produces a flavor eerily similar to a fresh oak barrel. Hops bill: East Kent Goldings, Chinook, and Cluster."

Thoughts: Perfect crime, goddamnit it's the perfect crime, motherfucker it's the perfect crime. I said it's perfect!

This Collab brew poured a very dark brown with some reddish tones and a huge fluffy multicolored tan head. It's got a nice look to it, there's no denying that. What? Is looking good a criminal offence? Then set me free, ya fuckin' CD.

Smells pretty cool. Spicy Belgian yeast, really strong and up front. It's awesomely roasty in its nature. Loads of toasted malt in this, and thankfully it doesn't remind me at all of coffee. There's a hint of fruitiness in the background, but that's hiding out for the most part.

A ton of hop characteristics in the taste. That Belgian yeast is strong and permeates throughout the whole beer, but at first gulp each time there's a blast of hop bitterness and resin. Pretty damn good. And it's not overly bitter either, nor is it tart, but it's just on the edge of those things. I suppose the malts pull it back right before it even gets close, by delivering a dash of that sweetness there. It's got a lot of roasted, smokey flavors that come through once you start breathing the air for a while.

Mouth is pretty wet but thick. It lingers for a while. Also, it drops all of that flavor on the back of the tongue and just laughs about it.

There's an Evil feeling in our brains, but its nothing new, you know it drives us insane! So said Venom.

December 8, 2012

An Interview with Dr Blood! The Death of Horror, Dorothy has a breakout... and cheese covered ramen noodles.


Horror is officially dead. Dr Blood said so. A few days ago I contacted the Brit himself to ask him a few questions. Questions about life, death, and about his outlook on the modern age of horror. He told me sure since he was bored, but warned that his "brain is mush from watching shitty movies so hopefully you'll get a laugh" out of his answers. Dr Blood does a lot for the people out there in la-la land. You may not think much of it at first, and if you're not prepared, then maybe you're offended by his words, or even taken aback. He's most often than not about as subtle as a brick to the face, and while he slightly makes more sense than I do on a normal day, he's got about a hundred times the charm of the average negative creep. Enjoy the show!

Dr Unketh: Who is Dr Blood? What's his deal?

Dr Blood: I'm Dr Blood, I have been since 1994 when I started writing capsule movie reviews for a now defunct horror magazine. My site, "DR BLOOD'S VIDEO VAULT", has been online since 1997 although I moved the bulk of it to Blogger back in the Summer of 2010 simply because it's easier to update than the previous incarnations of my online presence. I'm a 42 year old Brit who has been living in America for the past 5 years. I've had the usual ups and downs, watched nearly every horror movie known to Man several times over, and I'm still watching even more of them. I love cats, hate dogs, don't suffer fools gladly (or at all), and I mainly earn my living from messing about with other people's computers. I also cook.

 Let's talk about Horror. Is horror really "dead"?

Horror has, unfortunately, reached a point where it's just unimaginative, repetitive and a chore to watch. Everybody is cloning everything else and, the truth is, they have been without many exceptions since the early '80s. At the moment, with the lack of investment from the big studios in new horror, and the no-budget clones of things we've already seen, it really is fair to say that horror is dead. I don't know about horror in books because I can't read.

How do you feel about the current state of horror releases on Blu-ray?

I think the Blu-ray format is just a money-making scam. Unless you have a huge HDTV (over 60 or 70 inches), you really aren't going to notice that much difference. Plus the transfers of some movies actually look worse than they do on DVD. The Blu-ray format would have been better used to put multiple movies onto one disc rather than increasing the bitrate or whatever it is they do before adding a ton of special features which nobody ever watches.

What company do you feel gives the most respect to horror films with their releases (or re-releases)?

Lionsgate. Lionsgate owns the back catalog of just about everything. Sooner or later they will release it too. In the past, Anchor Bay were the ones to watch, but some of their titles were of dubious commercial appeal. I don't understand what goes into the various marketing decisions because, most of the time, none of the companies really listen to what horror fans want. I know that obtaining the rights to a lot of movies is difficult specially when franchises span more than one studio, but there are some things which will never appear on DVD even though they were readily available on VHS. Those need to be re-released by somebody. Of course, the streaming online services have decimated the DVD and Blu-ray markets, but that's another story.

Is there a company that you feel is really stepping up in the world of horror when it comes to releasing better shit?

I want to say Shout Factory, but I can't justify their prices for some of the crappy older movies they've been putting out. It's nice to have them for completeness, but there comes a point when double-dipping becomes less important. Synapse is slightly cheaper, but again, their selection and prices make me scratch my head in disbelief.

There is a lot of competition out there with distributors, and a lot have come up pretty short. Do you think any of them have done more damage than good? Or have released too many underwhelming releases (simple re-dos, non-anamorphic, ect)?

Paramount definitely. Just look at all the versions of the Friday the 13th series with hardly any extras. Sony and Warner Bros (RIP) have been guilty of the same thing in the past as well. As for the newer companies, I'm not sure because I'm not buying as many new releases as I used to anyway.

In terms of Independent Horror, what is the last thing you can recall that has made a valid impact to either yourself, the genre, or beyond?

This is a tricky one because two many people confuse independent horror with amateur, no-budget crap. The last real independent horror movie (before it was picked up by a studio) which I think made an impact was Paranormal Activity. It was better with the original ending though.

Are there any Independent filmmakers out there right now that you'd like to see get more coverage without sacrificing their own visions, and do you even think that is possible?

No. Again, due to the confusion over what it means to be an independent filmmaker now, I think they should all give up and get real jobs. I don't want to see any more backyard zombie epics or slasher films made by a gang of beered-up friends. Film school graduates are also the worst culprits for flooding the market with crap. Out of the real industry people, Robert Hall showed talent in "Lightning Bug" (2004) which he threw away with "Chromeskull" (2011). "Laid to Rest" was a decent but formulaic entry which deserved more praise than in got.

On the topic of independent filmmakers getting "real jobs", what about those who have real life dreams and passion? Have you seen any of Gregory Lamberson's (Slime City, Naked Fear) or Brian Paulin's (Bone Sickness, At Dawn They Sleep) films?

They should take their ideas to a studio to see how realistic those dreams are. If a studio won't invest in them, the chances are that it's because they don't know what they are doing. Anyone can make a film, just go to Wal-mart buy a camera and use glove puppets if you have to, but making a good film which people will actually pay to see is another matter. Some people may dream to be an astronaut, but it's not going to happen. These "filmmakers" need to spend years in the movie industry (not just the horror fan film industry), learn the techniques, and work their way up before announcing that they are a director after five minutes. Even then their movies could still turn out to be a load of crap. I haven't heard of any of the people you've named, I've never seen any of their movies (as far as I know), and I probably never will. Having been burnt so many times by the "indie horrors" with similarly stupid titles, I'm not interested in what they are offering. 

I've noticed that you've been watching a lot of horribly cheap independent horrors as of late. Are you a sado-masochist, or do you just enjoy these horrid flicks?

Ah, there's a reason for this. I'm watching them to settle that old and erroneous assertion that all these wannabe filmmakers keep making about "indie horror" being so groundbreaking and innovative. If by "groundbreaking and innovative" they mean derivative of Hollywood, formulaic, boring and badly produced hack jobs, then I'll agree with them. I've watched hundreds of these "independent horrors" over the years due to Zone Horror in the UK and the various Pendulum Pictures packs which I skimmed through in 2008 without really paying much attention to what was going on. Now I'm giving them the attention they wanted and noticing a lot of patterns. It's not good and I'm not enjoying the experience. In fact, I'm probably going to have to start eating bucketfuls of St. John's Wort or get some prescription anti-depressants if I watch any more of them.  

What's the best no-budget film you've ever seen?

There is no such thing as a best no-budget film. They don't even count as films to me, just glorified YouTube videos. Unless it's a foreign movie where the budget is smaller anyway then I can't even think of one. I try to erase them from my memory once I've reviewed them. 

If you were to make a no-budget horror film, what would it be about and what hot chicks would you cast in it?

I'd make a porno-horror. Because it would sell. Let's face it, most of these indie horrors look like porn movies without the porn anyway. Witches and vampires going at it would be good. Throw in some werewolves for bestiality! I can't think of any "hot chicks" from the "indie horror" scene who I would cast in it because they are all rather vile creatures who can't leave the tattoo and piercing parlours alone for more than 5 minutes. I'd want to see real movie stars getting nasty for no money.

Is there any particular style of horror that you're currently "the most" into?

Extreme horror floats my boat. I go through phases such as ghost stories or anything supernatural, but just lately I've become very misanthropic and love to see other people having their lives ruined.

What are five of your very favorite movies?

"A Serbian Film" (2010), "Mum and Dad" (2008) , "The Omen" (1976), "The Thing" (1982), and "An American Werewolf in London" (1981).

Everybody's got a list of their favorite horror films. What I want to know is, what are the links between your favorite films? Are there a lot of certain similarities between themes and events?

I don't think there are any links at all apart from decent stories and characterization. It doesn't even have to be the most linear story or the most well-rounded characterization either as long as there's enough of both to cause an emotional response.

Remember when Scream came out and then horror got diluted with these PG-13 trendy-song driven, good-looking teen horror and everyone said that it really blew? Now that all horror is too "meta" and "everything sucks", it seems as if everyone's got a problem with horror flicks no matter what. It even went through stages of Asian influence, shakey-cam found-footage after the Blair Witch bullshit, torture porn, and the remake epidemic. When you think about it, was the aftermath of the original Scream really that bad?

I would rather watch pretty actors and actresses than the "more tattoos than teeth" kind. I want fantasy and escapism with my horror. If I want to see the girl next door, I'll watch her come out of her house and go to work in Wal-mart. I don't want to see her on my TV or cinema screen. As for the influence of "meta" movies, that crap has been going on back to the '80s but "Scream" just made it obvious to the dumber generation who hadn't picked up on it. It's like working in retail or food service in some ways. Once you see the stockroom full of cobwebs and mouse turds, the overpriced items displayed under fluorescent shop lights don't seem so special anymore. 

Are there any films from that era that you enjoy?

"The Crow" (1994) which predates "Scream" by a year of course. After "Scream", not many. I didn't get anything out of the "I Know What You Did Last Summer" series, the "Scream" sequels or its clones such as "Urban Legend". After "The Craft" I jumped genres to sci-fi with "Species" back then. I also enjoyed "The Frighteners"(1996), "Even Horizon" (1997), "Deep Rising" (1998) and "Wishmaster" (1998) though. I don't remember any of the other horror or sci-fi movies standing out that much until the very end of the '90s.


What are some of the more recent "popular" horror films that you've seen recently and enjoyed?

"Twilight". The whole saga! I don't care what anybody thinks of me, I liked them, they interested me, and they belong in the horror genre as much as "Dark Shadows" no matter what anyone says. I could have done with Jacob keeping his shirt on a lot more, but the final two movies made it all worthwhile. I'm not so keen on "Resident Evil" or "Underworld" although if pushed, I'd go for the latter. If you mean the "Saw" movies or "Paranormal Activity" then I really didn't get into them other than the first movie of each franchise. 

And speaking of hot chicks: Kate Beckinsale or Milla Jovovich?

Facially, Kate Beckinsale. She's getting on a bit now, but she's still very nearly perfect. I think Milla is sexier and less doll-like though. If I had to choose, it would be Kate.

Got any favorite cover art?

I can't think of any because the distributors keep on changing it from what I was familiar with on VHS. I think "Mute Witness" was clever with the word "Mute" made to look like stitches over the girl's mouth. I also like "Martyrs".

Could you name a few of your favorite films while you were a lad? Non horror stuff particularly.

"The Italian Job" (1969), "Quadrophenia" (1979) and all the "Carry On" movies. Basically, I watched a lot of British movies and barely bothered with American movies at all. "Star Wars" (1977) had a big impact and was the half-way house due to where it was filmed (and some of the actors). [Oh, and James Bond.]

You seem pretty high strung in some of your rants. What do you do to calm yourself, aside from ranting?

I'm not highly strung at all. I just write that way to be controversial and stir people up. I'm actually cool enough all the time to be considered cold, abrupt and quite ruthless. I find a lot of my writing to be rather dry and uninspiring especially when it's yet another review of some formulaic nonsense which was predictable from the first 5 minutes. I find reviewing movies to be a chore most of the time. Sometimes I wonder why I bother since hardly anybody reads my blog (or anyone else's) anyway. I check the page hits only to see the strangest things get hundreds of page views while something I actually put a lot of effort into gets maybe 5 or 10. When I get really fed up with it, I play with my cats, add some more cows to Farmville, or drink Monster energy drinks until my urine turns bright yellow.

You said you cook? What kind of foods do you cook? And what is your passion in the kitchen?

As a trained chef  (I was valedictorian at the end of my training too),  theoretically I should be able to cook anything. In my last restaurant, I mainly cooked sloppy things like curries because it's easy. I'm also very passionate about the microwave. Don't knock it, it's great for fish!

What's your favorite kind of ramen? Besides the cheapest one of course.

Chicken flavour. I actually strain the "gravy" or "soup" off them before adding cheese but I do like a little bit of flavouring to them other than just plain noodles. 

Whoa there, you add cheese to ramen!? What the hell dude!?

Yes, I grate cheddar cheese over the top of the hot noodles in a bowl and it goes all melty. It's a student thing. I know the real Ramen is a soup, but I don't like soup apart from oxtail. You don't have Heinz Oxtail Soup in America so I've had to live without it. If I wanted the Japanese Ramen, I'd buy those little bowl things with bits of dried vegetables and a packet of slime.

Since American beers suck ass, what would you suggest for someone like me if I ever travel to the British Islands?

Anything at all because the water and ingredients taste different, the brewing process has been refined by centuries more of practice, and everything in the pub will be more alcoholic than in the American bars. One tip I learnt as a barman is to only drink the bottled beers because the drip trays get tipped back into some of the draft barrels to maximize profits. I think Guinness on draft may be one of the few that it's impossible for a landlord to interfere with. I'm a big fan of Newcastle Brown Ale, Tennants Super, and Calsbery Special Brew. Don't ever drink Gold Label Barley Wine unless you want to throw up before anyone else though.

What is life all about, if anything?

You can live in the moment or spend all your time preparing for death. At it's most basic level, life is about finding a mate,  procreation, nurturing the next generation, and making sure you have enough to eat for the duration. All the other things we do are just fluff or folly. I believe there's something better afterwards. I don't feel sorry for atheists whose entire lives are pointless because I can't stand their pedantic arguments, or their lifestyles which usually go hand-in-hand with sexual deviancy, finicky eating or other hipstery fads which don't interest me. You get an average of 70 trips around the Sun, and if you spend all your time either making yourself miserable or making other people miserable, it's your loss because you won't get a second chance. Cut your coat according to its cloth and just accept that you won't know anything for sure until it's all over. If by some slim chance, there's nothing to know, it won't matter anyway because you'll have no consciousness.

Thanks Dr Blood.

This is Drunketh, blacking out.

December 5, 2012

Sierra Nevada NarwhaL

Sierra Nevada NarwhaL - Imperial Stout (2012)
Winter Seasonal? (New)
12 fl. oz. (x4) / $9.99 USD / 10.2% ABV

About: "A malt-forward monster, highlighting the depths of malt flavor. Narwhal Imperial Stout is inspired by the mysterious creature that thrives in deepest fathoms of the frigid Arctic Ocean. Featuring incredible depth of malt flavor, rich with notes of espresso, baker's cocoa, roasted grain and a light hint of smoke, Narwhal is a massive malt-forward monster. Aggressive but refined with a velvety smooth body and decadent finish, Narwhal will age in the bottle for years to come. Yeast: Ale / Bittering Hops: Magnum and Challenger / Aroma Hops: Challenger / Malts: 2-Row Pale, Caramel and Chocolate, Honey, Carafa and Roasted Barley."

Thoughts: NarwhaL poured a super-dense total midnight black right out of the bottle with a half finger beautiful, dark milk chocolate head.

This fucking beer smells outstanding! The first thing I get is syrup. And it hits hard too! Nothing subtle about this one. Heavy thick sludge like syrup in the scent. Loads of malt, Hershey's chocolate bars, some absurdly sweet coffee in the back, and a little bit of the earth left behind.

The taste is immense! Rich dark malts come through first, tons of sweetness, smoke, and a stinging boozy haze. A lot of that coffee flows through right after that once you breathe in, followed by an instant grassy aftertaste. This thing is blazing with roasted malts. There's a fair amount of peppery spice here too. Also, some hidden dark fruit type stuff going on far in the background if you just let your mind wander a bit while settling this in your mouth. It starts off with a sting, and while it slowly mellows, it doesn't really mellow at all. This stuff is boisterous, loud and hits like a brick. It's got a far-off candy like quality to it, especially as it warms, but for the most part it's not overly done in any one direction. The tastes here all blend perfectly and mingle well together. You can pick apart each and every feature, and yet, nothing is dominating here... only the severe blast of flavor.

Mouth feel is thick, syrupy, slightly foamy, sticky, dusty after the swallow, and coating.

This Imperial Stout has a pretty significant hop profile, but it's not too bitter for me. Personally I think the balance has been perfectly done for for such a hop driven company. There's a lot of sweetness here, and just the right amount of bitterness. It could use a few ghost chilies in the mix, but I'm not really complaining as I can add that myself. Thinking of mixing this with 1050 just for the fuck of it...

December 4, 2012

Mixing Beers #7

Dogfish Head 120 Minute IPA (2012) "VS" Dogfish Head World Wide Stout (2009)

WHAT'S GOIN' ON: What is it about extreme craft beers that attract and intrigue drinkers from around the globe? A rather valid question I would say so myself. The answer, dear reader, is the booze! Deny it as you may, forlorn objects of destitute bewilderment, but know it to be true as my words speak in an absolute resolution when I say that yes!, sweet succulent and inviting booze warmth is indeed a spectacular and wondrous event to behold. True as it may be that hidden, layered and sometimes even delectable textures  - flavors even - come about within a drink of higher altitude, be not fooled preposterous mortal, for it is booze which is the code of law. The very law and blessedly horrid nature in which dictates the ceremony's presented craftsmanship: Getting shitfaced.

HOW IT WENT DOWN: I pop the yellow warning caps off of both bottles. I slowly bring the just released 2012 bottle of 120 up to my nose. It smells amazing. I grab the 2009 bottle of WWS, and do the same. Is smells scary. I think I'm in lust. Let the games begin, I say to myself, as I type this very sentence.

The mix of these combined monstrosities forms into a super dark cinnamon that's not exactly jet black and features a glowing reddish brown head. The head is minimal and leaves a thin layer of foam around the edges. Grain is evident throughout the newly evolved brew.

I lean in and notice that it smells like a forest full of ripe prunes, plums and berries. Some coffee comes through, but it's way off in the distance, underneath that pool of devilish booze. I close my eyes and smell this for another three minutes, slowly drifting into another plane of consciousness.

I take my first gulp, and realize that this is indeed, some righteous shit. The depth, the flavor... is just, legendary. It's sweet, has a fiery haze of boozy dark fruit notes that hit right away and bounce and explode all over the place, then after the swallow a gentle sweet cut-grass and mocha coffee come flowing through. A minor burning sensation strangles from the inside of the throat in each swallow. This is most indubitably, a syrup of ecstasy. A heavy smokiness from the WWS engulfs the senses, as do incredible candied hop notes from the 120, and it just a masterful blend of liquid death.

And on top of it all, my misanthropic minions, this mixing of two elixirs is incredibly smooth! The mouth feel is silky, velvety, syrupy and yet, it feels as if it becomes whipped cream disintegrating during the swallow. This beautiful potion is indeed... a drink of wonders.

December 3, 2012

Mixing Beers #6

Sierra Nevada Celebration Ale (2012) "VS" Oskar Blues Ten Fidy (2012)

WHAT'S GOIN' ON?: Sierra Nevada's Celebration Ale was one of the first craft brews that I had ever tried. It may have been the fourth, maybe the fifth. I love it, always have, no doubt always will and every time I look at that artwork and those colors, I get a funny feeling of fond remembrance. And I think of snow. Man, do I love me some snow. You know what goes good with snow? What goes good with winter and the holidaze? Some rich ass Imperial Stouts, that's right. Have a dirty cookie. I drank the first three of my 4$ each 12 oz. cans of Ten FIDY in a row and it was a pretty damn good experience. I saved one for whatever, at the time I didn't know... but when I brought home a 3-Pack of Celebration later in the week, I decided that the first Fresh Hop Ale of the Winter would be a mix brew review. 

HOW IT WENT DOWN!: The beautiful orange-reddish tones from the SN Celebration were slowly flooded and corrupted by the black spreading shadows, eventually turning this beer dark as night. The head is white with drops of tan inside, looking a bit like hot chocolate with melted marshmallows.

The strong hops in this take precedence and are not to be outdone by the roasted characteristics from the 1050. But eventually a hurling malty flow comes forth and sits along with it side by side. I do definitely prefer the scent of the Celebration alone over this combined form, since it's just so beautiful, however this mingling isn't half bad either.

Taste is a very strange one. You get a battle in the mouth starting off with a smooth texture, then crackling hops and after the swallow, a roasted bitterness and some intense toasty burn. If anything, the Fresh Hop Ale really adds a lot to this stout, by bringing forth some tingling hop driven persistence. It's got a very deep taste to the whole thing, very rich and creamy, and soothing yet eventful. Hops dance around through this tingling smoky haze and both beers play off of each other very well.

Mouth feel is syrupy, thick and extremely coating. And even then, it's surprisingly smooth. 

Though spicy and popping up front, the beer mellows just before the swallow and leaves a grassy aftertaste and a fire roasted burnt sensation. This was a pretty neat mixing of beers overall, and did a number on my tastebuds. As much as I liked it, I wonder to myself now if anything will ever top the mix of Pumking and WWS. Is it all downhill from here? That worried thought shall do nothing to deter me from mixing additional beers in the future and posting my results right here, however substandard they may seem compared to that utterly wondrous event.

Firestone Walker's Reserve Porter


Firestone Walker's Reserve Porter (2012)
Brewed and Bottled by Firestone Walker Brewing Co., in Paso Robles, CA. USA
Limited Reserve Series.
22 fl. oz. / $2.99 USD (Sale) / 5.8% ABV

About: "A singularly distinctive beer that represents our finest brewing efforts, Walker’s Reserve is a elegant dark ale featuring robust flavors of toffee, caramel and bittersweet chocolate. This brew employs five specialty malts, as well as oat and barley flakes, for added complexity and flavor. Malts: Premium Two-Row, Maris Otter, Crystal 77, Crystal 120, DH Carafa, Chocolate, Wheat, Oat Flakes / Bittering Hops: U.S. Goldings / Late Kettle Hops: East Kent Golding / Whirlpool Hops: Cascade. Winner of four Gold Medals, two Silver Medals and two Bronze Medals."

Thoughts: The beer poured a dark and impossible to see through brown with a huge light tan head full of extremely small bubbles. Nice. Tons of sticky lacing. The massive head eventually died down to a one finger thick fluffy glop atop the brew, and now it's going nowhere.

I'm getting a really clean watery profile on this. There's a bit of spice that comes through, a nice bursting of hops, black cherries, and a low flow of cold chocolaty malt.

On first gulp I was hit with a bit of tartness up front, a peppery spiced flow, some sticky candy, and a little bit of grass on the back of the tongue. There's a sticky sweetness that comes bouncing through, and a lot of roasted toasty notes all around. It's pretty smokey too. Very low coffee rumblings, mostly just a charred woody taste, like oatmeal, and minor bitter chocolate. It's got a pretty heavy hop characteristic, which I think is what I'm liking about it more than some other porters I've tried. It's fruity, tart and a bit leafy.

Mouthfeel is very crisp, clean and just a little watery. It's strange, like there's super carbonation in this... but it doesn't expand in the mouth and puff out. Only tingles with tons of mini bubbles. Cool stuff.

This is a pretty strange one. Definitely interesting. Best porter I think I've ever had.

December 2, 2012

Founders Breakfast Stout

Founders Breakfast Stout - Double Chocolate Coffee Oatmeal Stout (2012)
Brewed and Bottled by Founders Brewing Co., in Grand Rapids, MI. USA. 
Winter Seasonal (Sep-Feb).
12 fl. oz. / $2.95 USD / 8.3% ABV

About: "You’ve got to love coffee to truly appreciate this phenomenal brew. Brewed with an abundance of flaked oats, bitter and sweetened imported chocolates, Sumatra and Kona coffee. We’re actually not sure if this is some type of coffee cake or a beer. Either way you can drink this ale with a fork. Breakfast Stout has an intense fresh roasted coffee nose topped with a cinnamon colored frothy head that seems to never fade and makes you wish breakfast could last forever."

Thoughts: Poured a dark mahogany color that formed into a deep black. The dark tan head was very slow to form but left a half a finger head atop the brew, before quickly dissipating into a puddle of foam.

Scent is going through phases... it started with coffee, cafe mocha, then the chocolate really came through strong, like rich milk chocolate and almost a little bit of dark chocolate mixed in. It's a little grainy, like chocolate Rice Crispies and there's a slight bit of booze, but it seems well hidden.

Got a smoky sting on the first gulp. It's almost hot, like it's got peppers in it or something. Weird. Chocolate adds to the overall taste but really falls back, and a smokey boozy sting with a huge dash of peppery hops get thrown at'cha. That Kona coffee really starts to pound down with a bitter flow and those bitter chocolates lessen the sweetness that a lot of stouts usually have. Getting a lot of molasses, caramel, and a toasty kind of marshmallow thing. It's got a sweetness to it, but it's about almost even with the bitterness.

Mouthfeel is like nothing I've experienced before. It's like pure silk. Amazing.

Again, tons of smoke and it feels like I just smoked after drinking this. My mouth is dry and hazy. It's a very roasted tasting brew overall. Heavy on that coffee, man. Raw shit. I wouldn't mind a bit more a syrupy oatmeal to it, but I do like mine just a tad sweeter. It's slightly burnt around the end, but all together it a heavy club over the head with strong coffee stoutness.

Funny thing happened in August of this year regarding this beer too: It was Banned in NH because the label features a baby "drinking". Hah. I thought their state motto was "Live Free or Die". A baby not being able to drink an 8.3% stout out of a cereal bowl doesn't sound to "free" to me. -_-

Oskar Blues TEN FIDY

Oskar Blues TEN FIDY (2012)
Brewed and Canned by Oskar Blues Brewery, in Longmont, CO. USA.
Year Round Brew.
12 fl. oz. (x4) / 15.99 USD / 10.5% ABV

About: "This titanic, immensely viscous stout is loaded with inimitable flavors of chocolate-covered caramel and coffee and hide a hefty 98 IBUs underneath the smooth blanket of malt.  Ten FIDY (10.5% ABV) is made with enormous amounts of two-row malt, chocolate malt, roasted barley, flaked oats and hops. Ten FIDY is the ultimate celebration of dark malts and boundary-stretching beer."

Thoughts: Look what just showed up in town (I never see this stuff anywhere aside from trips to NH), and hell, it's only two and a half weeks old. Nice.

Ten Fidy poured a super dark brown that turned instant black in the goblet. It's got a dark milk chocolate head, and tiny black bubbles that move slowly towards the edge of the glass. It looks like floating forward through space. I'm officially tripping out while staring into this beer.

Smells like cold ass coffee, and after that fades, chocolate cereal... like syrup covered smacks or something. Thick and sludgy, notes of chocolate and toasty oats. It smells very sugary.

Tons of roasted malt explode in the mouth, followed by a sweet haze of booze, an extremely gentle bitterness and a warm feeling all over. Getting some dark fruit notes, and after a while the hops start tingling all around the place. Coffee in the taste is laying low, and there's a dominantly roasted and toasty quality to the whole brew. Lots of oats and barley, with caramel and chocolate in the background.

Finishes with some grassy tones and a haze of thick, foggy booze.

Mouth feel is pretty amazing. Probably the best thing about this beer. It's full, and just pops all over the place. It leaves a thick film in the mouth and coats after expanding really quick. This ones got a real warmth to it and I'm feeling the head down below. I like this one, but it's doubtful I'll buy another four pack anytime soon considering the outlandish price. It's all relative, but still. 

December 1, 2012

The Hot Babes of Demons 2 (1986)

Welcome damned readers, once again, to my blog which you have unfortunately clicked upon. I have a special treat in store for you two today: Chicks, man. I'm going to be talking about chicks that are hot, and posting pictures of said hot chicks. But not just any chicks! No, these are the girlies of Demons 2!

Sorry, O-Face. You didn't make the list.
Let's start with a babe that in terms of sheer hotness, edges out the competition here. 

1. Nancy Brilli as "Hannah"


Look at her. Would you just look at her!? I want to lick her face all over, just like that creepy ass dude in the psych ward in Terminator 2 did to Sarah Conner when she was restrained. Nancy has a really exotic type of hot look about her, oh and we're in luck, she's playing a preggo in this movie. Let me poke that baby. What the fuck? This was Brilli's second screen appearance back when she was fresh and moist, before she got work done(?) and botox and all that jazz. She still looks pretty damn hot though, and I suppose as women age (especially one that's accustomed to looking this hot all the time) they get a little desperate. I'm not going to hold that against her, as I could really give a shit either way. I'm just grateful that I've got her here in Demons 2, whenever I want her.


There will be more of her to come soon enough.

She's driving me... bananas! ;)
2. Coralina Cataldi-Tassoni as "Sally"

Sally Sally Sally... you little Demon Wench. Speaking of Hot Italian Babes, no list of these magnificent creatures could ever be complete without the American star of the show Coralina. 


Look at those chompers! I've got something she can bite. I've always loved this chick from the first time she appeared on screen. One of the great things about being a Dario Argento and Lamberto Bava fan is you get to see this hottie in a lot of their films. She's in Dario's Opera, Phantom, and Mother of Tears, and in Lamberto's Ghost Son. Not only is she super talented at doing all sorts of things like singing, songwriting, painting, acting and dying in gruesome ways in movies, but she's also super cute.


Well, when she's not foaming at the mouth that is!

"Honey, you got real ugly."
3. Maria Chiara Sasso as "Ulla"

You know, it's tough for me to say which of the three women so far is the most beautiful, but I'm going to try anyways. Maria in the blue dress here is probably the hottest chick in the film. Hell, in any film. It's too bad that she didn't do any other movies really. My old VHS of this is worn out during all of her scenes. Was this chick in Dario's Opera as well? 


With great beauty, comes great insufficiency. 


It's not her fault. None of the cameras work in this movie.

Seriously, I love this still. And can't help but laugh when I look at it.
4. Asia Argento as "Ingrid"


Awww. What a cutie. Future babe in the making Asia Argento made her feature film debut in this very groovy movie as Ingrid, the little girl who loves watching creepy crappy TV shows. I think it's pretty cool that her older sister was in the first film, and then she was in the sequel as well as the unofficial 3'rd Demons film: The Church. Twelve years later she even starred along side Coralina again in Dario's Phantom. A truly horrendous film of spectacular nature. Or was that a truly spectacular film of horrendous nature? No matter.


 Is that a stunt double in that last shot? Nah...

She's a screamer, baby.

5. Marina Loi as "Kate"

Does everybody in this movie look into the camera?

She deserved it. Marina is the first casualty of the movie. Let's all give her a round of applause! Not only was this chick the one that first noticed the Demon Fingernail in the mud, but she was also the one that cut herself on accident like a dumbass, and then to top things off, let her fucking blood drip into the dormant Demon's mouth while posing for a photo. What the hell happened to this lady anyways?

Magic Mirror on the ground, who's the bitch that's Demon bound?
6. Eliana Miglio as "Pam"

This dumb broad couldn't figure out how to work this camera to save her life.


And she just keeps taking pictures no matter what, all the fucking time and it's like, super annoying... all she's set out to do is get the perfect picture! What the fuck is that shit? What happened to the slut in the tent from the first film that couldn't wait to spread and get sliced. Oh and nice sweater over the shoulder look. I thought only dudes rocked that in the Demons series. Eliana has pretty much done nothing but TV Movies since Demons and Demons 2, which is funny since she was in the TV and Movie versions of the sub-stories presented within these films. So basically she's been doing the same stuff.


This is pretty much all she does here. Lift camera up, lower camera down. 

"THE PERFECT PICTURE!!!"
7. Virginia Bryant as "Mary"


Mary The Prostitute is the second most annoying character in this movie, ranking in just under that little squeeling Demon Puppet that runs amok and gives me a headache. When this chick gets stuck in the elevator after the power goes out, she just loses her goddamn mind and whines and screams and cries the whole fucking time! It's agonizing. You'll want to reach into the television and slap this bitch, let me tell ya. She gets hers though. And something tells me that this "lady" in an over-achiever, because she climbs two shafts in this movie. Ha ha, wow.


 8. Yvonne Fraschetti as "Jacob's New Potential Date-Rape Victim"


We never even learn this poor slut's name in the movie! What a damn shame. Look at those earrings, holy shit dude! Is it true what they say, the bigger the O the bigger the hoe? Yvonne makes this same face the whole time in all of her scenes. Seriously, she never changes her expression... not once. It's pretty funny. I like that look she's making too. It's pretty hot. We never really learn much about her other than she doesn't like dangerously fast cars or getting date raped. You never know until you try though, right?


Honorable Mention: Susan's Sweet Booty!


Hank the Instructor (Bobby Rhodes) gives the look of approval.

"Right Susan, Right!"

This is drunketh, blacking out.
My words are my own and as of posted from their creation forward I hereby claim originality to them. Pictures may prove to be promotional items and are the sole possessions of their respectful owners and/or companies. I do not sell, nor do I buy. I only rent, so therefore, nothing I own is truly mine.